• |

    Oct. 14, 2026

Preparing for Potentially Expanded BIPA Exposure After the Meta Decision

Companies that collect voice data may face heightened risk related to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) following a recent Northern District of California decision. In Delgado v. Meta Platforms, Inc., the court focused on Meta’s alleged ability to convert voice recordings into biometric data and use that data to identify an individual, rather than on whether Meta had actually taken either step. That reasoning may provide plaintiffs with a new avenue for challenging AI voice-processing technologies and could result in more complex and costly BIPA litigation. With insights from experts at Baker Donelson, Blank Rome, KamberLaw and Lewis Brisbois, this article explores the court’s reasoning, the decision’s key takeaways and the compliance measures companies can adopt to strengthen their defenses and mitigate risk. See “BIPA Litigation Dynamics Following Seventh Circuit Clay Decision” (May 20, 2026).

Navigating the Interplay of E.U. Data and AI Laws: Legal Landscape

Understanding any one E.U. data law is no longer enough for organizations trying to determine their compliance obligations. The E.U.’s GDPR, AI Act, Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, Data Act and NIS2 regulate different aspects of data, technology and cybersecurity, but their requirements frequently intersect. Distilling insights offered during a BARBRI program by attorneys from Anderson & Kreiger and Ogletree Deakins, this first article in a two-part series provides an overview of the five principal E.U. data laws and directives, and addresses the interplay among those regimes. Part two will examine available guidance and enforcement trends, and offer advice on how organizations can prepare to comply with the laws. See our two-part series on cybersecurity obligations in the E.U.’s Digital Laws: “AI Act, CRA and NIS2” (Sep. 4, 2024), and “Data Act, DORA and Compliance Steps” (Sep. 11, 2024).

Fifth Circuit Affirms High Standard to Modify SEC Settlements Despite Acknowledged Inequities

Companies seeking to revisit SEC settlements should take note of a recent Fifth Circuit ruling that reinforces the formidable barriers to modifying agreements negotiated with sophisticated counsel. The decision arose from Apex Clearing Corporation’s effort to obtain more lenient terms after firms settling similar off-channel communications violations received less onerous treatment. This article examines why the court upheld the SEC’s denial of that request and, with expert commentary, offers practical guidance for parties considering challenges to agency settlements. See “SEC Penalizes Adviser for Failing to Preserve Off-Channel Communications” (Sep. 18, 2024).

Former FBI Special Agent Joins Nardello As Head of Cyber Operations in New York

Investigations firm Nardello & Co. has welcomed Austin Berglas as managing director and head of cyber operations in New York. He arrives from cybersecurity company BlueVoyant. For commentary from Berglas, see “How to Handle Rising Expectations for Board Cyber Education and Involvement” (Mar. 14, 2018); and “How Financial Service Providers Can Use Cyber Insurance to Mitigate Risk” (Jun. 8, 2016). For insights from Nardello, see “A Practical Look at the GDPR’s Data Breach Notification Provision” (Jan. 17, 2018).

Most-Read Articles